Or change the preload size so that less gets loaded into memory and more is streaming. There are Lite versions of each patch which you may want to use if you really like a particular sound and memory is slim. If you're using ProTools (32 bit at this point), it won't much matter that you have 6GB because it's not accessible, and Trilian will drain what you do have quickly. Everything plays and sounds very natural. Scarbee uses less RAM and just has an incredible feel and sound. I have run out of memory several times working with them on my 6GB Mac Pro. But some of the Trillium full basses are huge (> 1GB). It includes things like fretless and upright which you can't get through Scarbee. Trillium offers a lot of bang for the buck and it's very high quality stuff. Scarbee and Trillum both have noticeable load times as their instrument sizes are much larger. This is one of its greatest advantages over many other sample-based software products. But remember Xpand has nearly instant load for all of its sounds. ROMplers (hardware workstations) do this all the time. They do this to reduce the sample size with the rationalization most people don't play that high up anyway. There are limits as to how far up you can stretch without it being noticeable. The reason for this is that Xpand will use a simple sample at the high end and stretch it to cover the notes all the way up. I find with xpand/structure free (no matter how much tweaking, i.e varying velocities, legato gap, note duration etc) that the higher you go on the virtual fretboard the more 'virtual' they sound.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |